Applied Behavior Analysis Technician (ABAT) Practice Test

What distinguishes a conditioned punisher from an unconditioned punisher?

1. It has inherent aversive properties

2. It becomes punishing through association

3. It does not require prior exposure

4. It is always effective in all contexts

The correct answer is: It becomes punishing through association

A conditioned punisher is distinguished from an unconditioned punisher primarily because it becomes punishing through association. This means that a conditioned punisher gains its ability to reduce the occurrence of a behavior not because of its inherent properties but rather due to the learning history or experiences of the individual. For instance, a neutral stimulus, such as a warning tone, may become a conditioned punisher after being paired with an aversive event, leading a person to avoid or change their behavior in the presence of that tone. In comparison, an unconditioned punisher has inherent aversive properties that do not depend on conditioning or prior learning. This could include stimuli such as pain or extreme temperature, which are naturally understood as punishing. Conditioned punishers require that prior associations are established before they can serve their function in modifying behavior. Thus, the ability of a conditioned punisher to influence behavior is reliant on the context in which the individual has experienced that specific stimulus in relation to an aversive outcome.